Same day, same hour, across the whole country. The papers open at the same minute everywhere. Silence. Invigilators. No phones, no talking. Outside, parents light candles. Three hours later you walk out, and for months you wait for a list of names and numbers that will say who gets in and who stays out.
If you saw this in a documentary about some unknown tribe, you’d call it an initiation rite.
The idea
This is Jiang Xueqin’s argument, and it doesn’t come from someone who failed. He was born in 1976 in a poor fishing village in southern China. His father washed dishes in Toronto, and he got into Yale on a full scholarship. He won the game, and he says the game isn’t what you think it is.
Meritocracy, he says, isn’t an education system. It’s a religious project.
To see it, go back a thousand years. In the Middle Ages people knew the world was broken and couldn’t be fixed. Their job was to endure, pray and wait. Paradise came after death, and God gave it.
Then came an idea that changed everything: why wait? Paradise can be built here, in this life, by human hands. You don’t need a miracle, you need a mind: logic, science, a plan. We call it modernity.
Where did that idea come from? According to Jiang, its roots are in Kabbalah, the mystical tradition of Judaism, which speaks of “repairing the world” by human hands. Masonic circles kept it alive, closed clubs where 18th-century merchants, scientists and politicians met. From there, he says, came the revolutions, the American and the French, which promised a new world built on Reason. And when the new world needed priests, it found them in the universities.
That’s why Jiang says “Freemasonry is the religion of capitalism.” Faith never left. It just changed temples. The temple is the university, the priests are the experts, and the initiation is the exam.
If Reason is the road to paradise, those who have the most of it should rule. And someone has to measure it.
The measuring has dates. In 1905 Alfred Binet creates the first intelligence test in France, to find which children need help. In America the test becomes a scale for weighing people. In the 1930s the president of Harvard, James Conant, puts the SAT to work choosing who gets in. From then on, the number is the ticket.
You’re not taking exams. You’re being put through a sieve for a paradise someone else designed.
And the sieve doesn’t work, not even for the ones who pass. It’s unfair: it measures memory and speed over three hours, not curiosity, passion or the ability to read people. It kills thinking: at the top universities there’s no room for mistakes, and out come bankers, lawyers and doctors, almost no one who thinks out loud. It never ends: when Jiang got in, Yale took one in five; today it takes fewer than one in twenty.
A system built to find the best ended up exhausting everyone.
When a religion fails, the faithful don’t question the god. They look for someone to blame. According to Jiang, the powerful have already found the culprits: family, culture, community, everything that can’t be measured and has to be taken out of the equation.
The next step, he says, is already here: a personal AI from birth that tells you to work out, to study, to be a good kid. And you listen to it like a god.
Jiang’s answer isn’t revolution. It’s something no system can measure: you didn’t arrive as a blank slate. You arrived as a whole person, with a purpose of your own. The sieve doesn’t ask who you are. It asks whether you fit.
At six, Jiang starts school in Canada without a word of English. The teacher says he should go back to kindergarten. His mother, who never set foot in a school, asks him: “What do you want?” “Second grade.” The best decision of his life was made by a six-year-old. Someone just bothered to ask him.
Practices
The question. Before every “what will you study” and every “what will you do next,” write “What do I want?” on paper and answer it before you listen to anyone else. Your answer first, theirs after.
The original. Twenty minutes a day with a great book: the Odyssey, the Republic, the Divine Comedy. No summary, no video explaining it in sixty seconds. The text, as it was written.
Hands in the soil. Once a week, make something you eat from scratch: basil in a pot, bread, a day at the olive harvest. What you don’t order can’t be taken from you.
The questions that never come up in the exam. Once a week, ten minutes: where do I come from, what am I doing here, where am I going. No grade, no right answer.
A failure off the CV. Once a month, start something that might turn out terrible and that you won’t post anywhere: an instrument, a language, a drawing. If you fail, you passed the only test that counts.